<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bleeding Edge Biotech &#187; Simulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/category/simulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog</link>
	<description>Bioinformatics and Big Iron</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:57:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thirty Years of (Bio)Molecular Simulation: How Far Have We Come?</title>
		<link>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/molecular-dynamics/thirty-years-of-biomolecular-simulation-how-far-have-we-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/molecular-dynamics/thirty-years-of-biomolecular-simulation-how-far-have-we-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Molecular Dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was originally intended to be micro-blogged talk. Probably on friendfeed. But when I walked into the old Chevron building on the Pitt campus to listen to Professor Wilfred van Gunsteren the wireless was spotty, so I saved my notes for a triumphant return to normal blogging. The talk is part of a lecture series [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was originally intended to be micro-blogged talk.  Probably <a href="http://friendfeed.com/e/f44cb9b9-2d9a-4c20-b1e7-1e8dded54ed4/Seminar-Predicting-Function-from-Protein/">on friendfeed</a>.  But when I walked into the old Chevron building on the Pitt campus to listen to <a href="http://fm-eth.ethz.ch/eth/peoplefinder/FMPro?-db=whoiswho.fp5&amp;-format=who%5fdetail%5fen.html&amp;-lay=html&amp;-op=eq&amp;who%5fname%5ffirstname=Wilfred%20Gunsteren&amp;-recid=34807&amp;-find=">Professor Wilfred van Gunsteren</a> the wireless was spotty, so I saved my notes for a triumphant return to normal blogging.  The talk is part of a lecture series presented by the <a title="Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations:Home" href="http://www.cmms.pitt.edu/">CMMS</a> at the University of Pittsburgh.  Since it was probably the intended purpose when I started Bleeding Edge Biotech; this is my notepad of the distinguished lecturer&#8217;s slides and talking points.</p>
<p><span id="more-116"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Computation based on molecular models is playing an increasingly important role in biology, biological chemistry, and biophysics. Since only a very limited number of properties of biomolecular systems is actually accessible to measurement by experimental means, computer simulation can complement experiment by providing not only averages, but also distributions and time series of any definable – observable or non-observable – quantity, for example conformational distributions or interactions between parts of molecular systems. Present day biomolecular modelling is limited in its application by four main problems: 1) the force-field problem, 2) the search (sampling) problem, 3) the ensemble (sampling) problem, and 4) the experimental problem. These four problems will be discussed and illustrated by practical examples. Progress over the past thirty years will be briefly reviewed. Perspectives will be outlined for pushing forward the limitations of molecular modelling.</p></blockquote>
<h4>Why Thirty Years?</h4>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;first simulations were performed in 1976..</p></blockquote>
<p>Molecular modeling choices to make:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Degrees of freedom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrees_of_freedom">Degrees of Freedom</a>: atoms are elementary</li>
<li>Forces (interactions between atoms)</li>
<li><a title="Boundary value problem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundary_condition">Boundary conditions</a></li>
<li>Methods to generate configuration of atoms: <a title="Newton's laws of motion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion">Newton&#8217;s equation</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Simulations can:</h3>
<ul>
<li>explain experiment</li>
<li>provoke experiment</li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">replace experiment</span></li>
<li>aid in establishing intellectual property</li>
</ul>
<h3>The four problems</h3>
<ul>
<li>Force field problem</li>
<li>The search (sampling) problem</li>
<li>The ensemble sampling problem</li>
<li>The experimental problem</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Force Field problem</h3>
<ul>
<li>small <a title="Free energy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_energy">free energy</a> differences</li>
<li>account for <a title="Entropy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy">entropic</a> effects</li>
<li>variety of atoms and molecules (keep it simple; transferable parameters)</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8230;using only the PDB for force field development just doesn&#8217;t work out.</p>
<p>Most dominant fold is not difficult; equilibra between folds is more important.  Should be able to get melting temperatures from simulations.  Solvent viscosity drives the kinetics of folding.  Todo: Polarizable force-fields.<br />
&#8212;</p>
<h3>The searching (sampling) problem</h3>
<p>A. convergence<br />
B. alleviated<br />
C. aggrevated</p>
<h4>Methods to compute free energy</h4>
<ul>
<li>counting configurations</li>
<li>thermodynamic integration (many simulations)</li>
<li>perturbation formula (one simulation)</li>
<li>One-step perturbation (few simulations)</li>
</ul>
<p>- use &#8220;soft-core&#8221; atoms for each site where the inhibitors will interact.</p>
<p>Original Viagra and Levitra could have benefitted from this method (IP, patents)</p>
<h3>The ensemble (sampling) problem</h3>
<ul>
<li>Entropy</li>
<li>Averaging</li>
<li>Non-linear averaging</li>
</ul>
<p>Coiled-coil stability has a strong entropic component.  For monomers the solute-solvent interaction decreases.  For trimers the solute-solute interaction decreases.  Entropy increases with temperature.  In trimers atomic fluctuations do not increase with temperature but solute entropy increases with temperature.</p>
<h3>The experimental problem</h3>
<ul>
<li>Averaging</li>
<li>Insufficient data</li>
<li>Insufficient accuracy</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;Averages are dangerous&#8221;</p>
<h4>Conclusions:</h4>
<ul>
<li>Experimental data cannot determine the average structure</li>
<li>Experimental data cannot determine the biomolecular structure</li>
</ul>
<p>Artifacts of XPLOR NMR refinement disagree with simulations guided by NOE-restraints<br />
- Two ensembles with no ensemble overlap and given same experimental data</p>
<p>&#8220;Experimental data is not sufficient&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t rely on structural data (It&#8217;s derived; strive for primary data)</p>
<h3>History</h3>
<p>1957 First molecule<br />
1964 atomic liguid (argon)<br />
1971 molecular liquid (water)</p>
<h3>Future</h3>
<p>2001 &#8211;<br />
2029 Biomolecules in water<br />
2034 E-coli<br />
2056 Mamallian cell (10^-9 sec)<br />
2080 Biomolecules in water (fast as nature) 10^6<br />
2172 Human body (10^27 atoms) 1 sec</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>So what</em></span> if you could simulate every atom in your body for 1 second?</p>
<p>&#8211; There&#8217;s much better things simulation can answer; ask better questions.</p></blockquote>
<h4>Polarizable Force Field</h4>
<p>- improves transferability between different environments<br />
- working on these force fields<br />
- solvation drives protein processes</p>
<h4>Coarse-graining</h4>
<p>- Need to switch FG/CG, back and forth<br />
- Run simulations in parallel<br />
- Easy to clamp 5 atoms to 1 but not easy to map 1 to 5<br />
- FG/CG replica-exchange simulation enhances sampling<br />
- Much faster to cross barriers in CG mode if you can switch<br />
- Both force-fields must be thermodynamically calibrated</p>
<p>We need simulations to explain experiment; so we can see the numbers.  For molecular modelers, there&#8217;s still enough work to do at least until 2172!</p>
<h4>Questions from the audience</h4>
<p>Q: What&#8217;s the state of NMR determination<br />
A: It depends, narrow bundles should have more motion.  Stable proteins are easy.  Averaging problem is present even in Crystallography.  Can&#8217;t get R-values.  Many many structures are not that good (XPLOR FF is simple, no solvent).  Found 20% of side-chain J-values cannot be right.  Simulation is getting to the point to correct experiment.</p>
<p>Q: Could you comment on CG model &#8216;clamping atoms&#8217; and potential problems related to entropy<br />
A: Take 5 atoms, make a ball, you lose entropy.  You should compensate that in the energy level?  You must balance it.</p>
<p>Q: Is Path integral still useful?<br />
A: No, we&#8217;d like to remove it next version of Gromos.</p>
<p>Professor van Gunsteren is a big believer in using all the data you can get your hands on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/molecular-dynamics/thirty-years-of-biomolecular-simulation-how-far-have-we-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What would you do with a million CPU&#8217;s?</title>
		<link>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/simulation/what-would-you-do-with-a-million-cpus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/simulation/what-would-you-do-with-a-million-cpus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/simulation/what-would-you-do-with-a-million-cpus/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a new podcast on Futures in Biotech with Dr. Pande from Folding@Home. Macresearch summarized it well: How a bunch of Sony PS3s have become the largest component of the world&#8217;s fastest computer The challenges of distributed computing, and in particular how data storage and CPU usage can actually complement each other After the hype [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/430295305_d8f6d8120e.jpg" alt="ps3folding" /></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a new podcast on <a href="http://www.twit.tv/FIB" title="The TWiT Netcast Network with Leo Laporte">Futures in Biotech</a> with Dr. Pande from <a href="http://folding.stanford.edu/" title="Folding@home - Main">Folding@Home</a>.  Macresearch summarized it well:</p>
<li>How a bunch of Sony PS3s have become the largest component of the world&#8217;s fastest computer</li>
<li>The challenges of distributed computing, and in particular how data storage and CPU usage can actually complement each other</li>
<li>After the hype in the 80s around computational modeling of protein structure, the computational power available today could finally make that hype a reality</li>
<li> How to take a non-parallel task and transform it into a series of computational chunks (a.k.a. how to make a baby in 1 day with 270 women)</li>
<li>How modeling of protein structure will be able to get more into the dynamics of protein conformational changes</li>
<li>What would you do if you had 250,000 CPUs?</li>
<p>I really like the final point, &#8220;What would you do with 250,000 CPU&#8217;s&#8221;, because it&#8217;s an important question.  Petascale computing has arrived but most applications aren&#8217;t ready to scale to thousands or millions of cores.  Folding@Home is as a distributed computing project as it is biomedical.  What they&#8217;ve been able to do is <em>treat simulations as data</em> and use <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_probability" title="Bayesian probability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia">bayesian</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_mining" title="Data mining - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia">data mining</a> techniques to put together the whole picture with suprising efficiency.  A clever workaround for Folding@Home&#8217;s &#8220;supercomputer&#8221;, which is severely limited by network latencies and individual agents with slow hardware compared to &#8216;real&#8217; supercomputers.  Finally he reports that PS3&#8242;s and GPU&#8217;s are achieving 20-30x acceleration.  Exciting stuff!</p>
<p><small>image taken from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/" title="Welcome to Flickr - Photo Sharing">Flikr</a>, <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/" title="Creative Commons&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;     Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic">CC licence</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/simulation/what-would-you-do-with-a-million-cpus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Innovative Use of HPC in Life Sciences</title>
		<link>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/simulation/most-innovative-use-of-hpc-in-life-sciences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/simulation/most-innovative-use-of-hpc-in-life-sciences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/simulation/most-innovative-use-of-hpc-in-life-sciences/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PSC and NRBSC have made the news again, this time in HPCwire. They&#8217;ve posted the Readers and Editors Choice awards for SC07 and the WiiMD demo earned us &#8220;Most Innovative Use of HPC in Life Sciences&#8221;. Further Reading: WiiMD: Bowling on Big Ben Engadget: wiimote used in buckyball bowling and other educational simulations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.psc.edu/" title="Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center">PSC</a> and <a href="http://www.nrbsc.org/" title="National Resource for Biomedical Supercomputing">NRBSC</a> have made the news again, this time in <a href="http://www.hpcwire.com/" title="HPCwire Home Page">HPCwire</a>.  They&#8217;ve posted the <a href="http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/1885812.html" title="HPCwire Announces Annual Readers' and Editors' Choice Awards">Readers and Editors Choice awards for SC07</a> and the WiiMD demo earned us &#8220;Most Innovative Use of HPC in Life Sciences&#8221;.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/12-5-07-buckyball_bowling.jpg" alt="wiimd_bowling" /></p>
<p>Further Reading:<br />
<a href="http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/molecular-dynamics/wiimd-bowling-on-big-ben/" title="WiiMD: Bowling on Big Ben at  Bleeding Edge Biotech">WiiMD: Bowling on Big Ben</a><br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/05/wiimote-used-in-buckyball-bowling-other-educational-simulations/" title="Wiimote used in Buckyball Bowling, other educational simulations - Engadget">Engadget: wiimote used in buckyball bowling and other educational simulations</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/simulation/most-innovative-use-of-hpc-in-life-sciences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WiiMD, interactive molecular dynamics with a wiimote?</title>
		<link>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/molecular-dynamics/wiimd-interactive-molecular-dynamics-with-a-wiimote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/molecular-dynamics/wiimd-interactive-molecular-dynamics-with-a-wiimote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Molecular Dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nintendo&#8217;s latest video console the Wii is doing very well. What I&#8217;ve found interesting is the exploration people are doing with the Wiimote controller itself. It&#8217;s already been used for video editing, playing Half-life, and even business presentations. A couple of months ago we were using it as a mouse in VMD and Chimera. Some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nintendo&#8217;s latest video console the Wii is doing very well.  What I&#8217;ve found interesting is the exploration people are doing with the Wiimote controller itself.  It&#8217;s already been used for video editing, playing <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asY_I8y6C0M">Half-life</a>, and even business presentations.  A couple of months ago we were using it as a mouse in <a href="http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/">VMD</a> and <a href="http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/">Chimera</a>.  Some <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/mndoci/~3/134786866/">interest</a> has peaked in having an application designed specifically for the use of the wiimote and scientific visualization.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/wiimote.jpg" title="wiimote"><img src="http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/wiimote.thumbnail.jpg" alt="wiimote" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.wiili.org/index.php/Main_Page" class="broken_link">Wii Linux</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asY_I8y6C0M">Wiimote playing Half-life</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bleedingedgebiotech.com/blog/molecular-dynamics/wiimd-interactive-molecular-dynamics-with-a-wiimote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

